Fishing Ban Debate: Protecting Snorkelers vs. Fishers' Rights at C.Y. O'Connor Beach (2026)

A potential fishing ban at C.Y. O'Connor Beach has sparked a heated debate in Western Australia. This proposed restriction, which aims to protect the thriving marine ecosystem and ensure the safety of visitors, has divided opinions among locals.

The City of Cockburn is considering implementing a no-fishing zone around the engineered fringing reef at C.Y. O'Connor Beach in North Coogee. This move follows a similar decision by the State Government in December, which imposed an 18-month fishing ban on demersal fish species along a significant stretch of the WA coastline, from Kalbarri to Augusta.

But here's where it gets controversial: the proposed ban has sparked concerns among fishers and recreational enthusiasts alike. Cr Phoebe Corke, who initially raised the proposal, fears an increase in fishing activity could attract sharks to the area, potentially endangering snorkelers and swimmers who frequent the reef.

The reef has become a popular destination, attracting not only snorkelers and swimmers but also school groups eager to explore the vibrant marine environment that has flourished on the reef's 270 concrete bombora modules, located just offshore.

Cr Corke believes that establishing a blanket no-fishing zone will help manage resource sharing issues and protect this important fish habitat area.

However, not everyone agrees. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) has already granted a no-fishing zone around the Coogee Maritime Trail, another popular dive and snorkel spot featuring the wreck of the Omeo. Yet, Recfishwest and the WA Fishing Industry Council argue that fishers and swimmers can coexist peacefully, citing the Ammo Jetty in Cockburn Sound as a successful example of shared water usage.

And this is the part most people miss: the proposed ban is not just about managing resources or preventing shark encounters. It's also about safety and sustainability, as highlighted by Dan Arndt, the City of Cockburn's director of sustainable development and safety.

"The concern is not just about potential negative interactions between snorkelers, divers, and spearfishers," Arndt explained. "It's also about the increased risk of shark attraction due to blood and burley in the water, which could pose a threat to all visitors."

Public consultation on the proposal will be open on the city's Comment on Cockburn website from February 2 to March 3, 4 pm. The city will review the gathered information and decide whether to request the Minister for Fisheries, Jackie Jarvis, and DPIRD to enact a no-fishing zone.

So, what do you think? Is this ban necessary to protect the marine environment and ensure visitor safety, or is it an overreaction that will impact the fishing community and recreational enthusiasts? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below!

Fishing Ban Debate: Protecting Snorkelers vs. Fishers' Rights at C.Y. O'Connor Beach (2026)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 5439

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.